THE BISHOP MURDER CASE (1928) by S.S. Van Dine

“Philo Vance / Needs a kick in the pance” – Ogden Nash

It is only with hindsight that we can properly discern the ebb and flow of patterns in crime fiction and separate the true trend setters, those destined to leave a lasting mark on a genre or movement, from mere fashionistas and copycats. When discussing the novels of S.S. Van Dine, it has become virtually de rigeur to quote Ogden Nash’s celebrated doggerel couplet, and I’m happy to oblige – because it is funny and because, by the time he wrote it, late in the series, it was probably a little bit true. Also, verse is very important to the plot of The Bishop Murder Case, without question one of Van Dine’s finest achievements. And once upon a time Vance was a fictional force to be reckoned with – does this, one of the best of his books, still stand up to scrutiny?

I humbly submit the following review under the guidelines of Bev’s 2011 Mystery Readers Challenge with a special word of thanks to that host as this book was a gift from the blogger herself. I hope to do it justice …

“Do you hope to run a murderer to earth by dillydallying over a chess game?”

This is a mystery which has a plot that feels quite modern and which, as is now the fashion, also has surprisingly high body count (nearly all the major non-series characters will have been murdered by the time it is over). It focuses on a murderer who kills his victims to follow a pattern based around a theme: in this case, nursery rhymes. First a man named Robin is found dead with an arrow in his chest (‘Who killed Cock Robin?/ ‘I’ said the sparrow / ‘With my bow and arrow); then another named Sprigg is found with a bullet through the head (‘He shot Johnny Sprig / Through the middle of his wig’), then another falls off a wall (Humpty Dumpty …) and so on. After each murder the criminal mastermind behind it all then taunts the press and the police with notes pointing out the connections with the rhymes, signing his letters as ‘The Bishop’. This all takes place within the confines of the large adjacent New York homes (see the map below) owned by three mathematicians, creating a truly bizarre pocket universe in which the story takes place over the course of a foggy April.

The inhabitants include Professor Dillard, a celebrated scientist, who lives with his adopted daughter Belle and his protegé Sigurd; then across the way there is Mrs Drucker and her son Adolph, a near-genius working on quantum theory; and finally there is Pardee, who is a chess wizard and who, like Robin, is in love with Belle. As the bodies start to pile up and the air of insanity becomes inescapable, the book begins to exert a quite magnetic pull as it draws togethern extraordinary range of ideas, all of which are steadfastly subordinated to the plot. Included in the heady mix, along with the aforementioned nursery rhymes, archery and chess are quantum mechanics, the plays of Henrik Ibsen, Freudian psychoanalysis as well as intimations of incest in not one but two parent-child relationships.

“Probably the most asinine character in detective fiction” – Raymond Chandler in ‘The Simple Art of Murder’


I previously profiled the author and his detective in one of my earliest blog entries, ‘The SS Van Dine Murder Case’, which you can read here. Although it would seem that the books are seldom read today in great numbers, they are discussed a lot on the blogosphere by fans of Golden Age detective stories with a mixture of affection and disdain. While Vance can easily be characterised as an American cousin to Dorothy L. Sayer’s Lord Peter Wimsey, the books are less controversial than their British counterparts, less prone to elicit the same kind of praise and condemnation; but also less in the way of sheer passionate debate as is still the case with her series. Instead the perception for many seems to be that Van Dine’s contribution was historically important but artistically much less enduring. This can be attributed to a number of factors already clearly in evidence in The Bishop Murder Case, which many, along with The Greene Murder Case, consider to be the cream of Van Dine’s output. The author (who, behind the pseudonym, was the art critic and Nietzsche scholar Willard Huntington Wright) believed that mysteries should focus purely on the creation and eventual solving of ingenious crimes and shouldn’t be saddled with the romantic subplots, social commentary or complex characterisation to be found in more ‘serious’ literary works. For many this can make the books seem arid and stuffy and, worse, make the protagonist too remote and unapproachable to maintain reader interest (which is more or less what Chandler was intimating in his famous essay).

“In Ibsen is the key to the mystery.”


And yet … The early Philo Vance stories were one of the great success stories of the 1920s and were a true publishing phenomenon – it is claimed that the books were largely responsible for keeping publishers Scribners solvent during the Depression. Wright had originally planned three novels in great detail and submitted these detailed synopses to his publisher before being given the go ahead. Bishop therefore, as the fourth in the series, was planned and written in the full flush of that initial success. The book is presented in a simple, unadorned but lucid prose style that is remarkably uncluttered, ensuring that all our attention is devoted to the case at hand as described by Van Dine, who appears in the book as the narrator, Boswell to Vance’s Johnson as it were.

This was itself an original addition to the genre on Wright’s part (taken up by ‘Ellery Queen’ shortly thereafter), a variation on the idea of Watson and Holmes – and there is something more than a little Sherlockian about Vance’s apparent disinterest in women, his genius knowledge of remarkably obscure bits of information and his focus on puzzles for their own sake rather for an overriding sense of justice. But this is all handled with considerable intelligence, as the novel is in fact, for its plot to work, very much predicated on a critique of those who would apply logic without a sound understanding of human motivation.

Leila Hyams and Basil Rathbone in the 1930 MGM film version of The Bishop Murder Case.

This is made clearer by having a contest within the novel (a bit like the duel between Poirot and a local detective Giraud in Christie’s 1923 novel, Murder on the Links) to solve the crimes between the more psychologically inclined Vance and the ultra-logical scientific methods employed by Sigurdur. Equally, the novel makes it clear that the lives of those who have no emotional outlets (meaning the scientists here, but clearly applicable to monomaniacal detectives like Vance and Holmes) are weakened, damaged and potentially destroyed by this fact. And in the case of Bishop, the plot as it is eventually revealed in its conclusion does in fact revolve around sexual jealousy, to a degree going against Van Dine’s edict against the use of romance in detective fiction. Wright/Van Dine was not as sensitive as Sayers and less interested in developing the private inner life of the protagonist – but on the other hand, his construction of plot is really quite superb and can still surprise as a whodunit in a way that Sayers often doesn’t

In addition, while there are those that would attack Van Dine for his inclusion of tons of seemingly extraneous material, both in Vance’s voluminous exegesis and the book’s seemingly endless use of footnotes, they tend to miss some important facts – in the early books the apparent extra-curricular infodumps are tied in superbly to the plots, so that when in this story Vance starts discussing the time travel possibilities envisaged by Einstein, this isn’t just filler but a fascinating look at the mind of the murderer; and as for the footnotes, on several occasions ‘Van Dine’ does in fact correct Vance, showing an ironic sensibility between the seemingly flat exterior. And this book also picks up some considerable dramatic momentum as it reaches its conclusion, with the hunt for a young kidnapped girl handled superbly well as we finally penetrate Vance’s seemingly imperturbable exterior to reveal the passion within.

I hadn’t read this book in a couple of decades, and then only in an Italian translation that omitted all the footnotes – thanks to Bev I have had the opportunity to re-acquaint myself with one of the great Golden Age classics of the 1920s. I heartily and unreservedly recommend this book. But let me leave the word to the great Julian Symons, who is often accused of being overly critical of this kind of story, but who in Bloody Murder had this to say of this book (and its predecessor, The Greene Murder Case), in particular:

“Yet admiration should not be withheld from these two books at least. In their outrageous cleverness, their disdainful disregard of everything except the detective and the puzzle, they are among the finest fruits of the Golden Age.”

***** (5 fedora tips out of 5)

This entry was posted in Dorothy L. Sayers, Ellery Queen, Five Star review, Lord Peter Wimsey, Philo Vance, Raymond Chandler, SS Van Dine, Vintage Mystery Reading Challenge 2011. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to THE BISHOP MURDER CASE (1928) by S.S. Van Dine

  1. Patrick says:

    I’m baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaack…

    You know, I really can’t say I like Van Dine, but this book has always sounded to me like his finest idea. However, I’ve heard that he managed to mess that up rather finely. Your review somewhat sparks my interest again. No! I must resist!!!

    By the way, I love that Pocket Book cover. I passed up a chance to buy it once, and have rather regretted it. It’s one of my favourites, right up there with the fantastic Pocket Book cover for “Nine and Death Makes Ten” and “The Red Widow Murders”.

  2. Hola compadre – you’ve been missed! But don’t resist, go get a copy, it’s worth it, really it is! The edition I have (in English) is the Fawcett edition which I treasure as it was a gift.

  3. TomCat says:

    Well, it’s true that The Bishop Murder Case sports Van Dine’s single creative contribution to the genre, a stratagem as famous as Doyle’s The Birlstone Gambit and Chesterton’s The Invisible Man, but I think he mucked it up badly – especially when you look what happened when his fellow brethrens picked up the ball and run with it. The only really good Philo Vance novel I read was The Kennel Murder Case.

    And the quote by Julian “Bloody” Symons somehow reminded that I still have to do a Rewriting the Book on Kanari’s Graveyard Isle and Van Dine’s The Greene Murder Case for my blog. I guess that’s the editorial spirit of Fred Dannay in me aching to be unleashed!

    Patrick, I have that particular edition of Nine-and Death Makes Death and it’s an absolutely stunning cover that perfectly captures the mood of the story (an ocean liner crossing submarine invested waters during WWII).

    • Hi TomCat, I kind of guessed you might prefer Van Dine’s locked room mystery! KENNEL was probably the last of the really decent Vance mysteries but I like BISHOP more as much for it departure into quantum theory as for its use of the nursery rhyme theme, which I think it does work as a highly suggestive motif in the book – look forward to hearing what you have to say about GREENE MURDER CASE!

  4. Bev says:

    Lovely review, as always! You have more than done justice to the book…and given us quite a bit of extra information as well. Thanks for the mention….I’m so glad you enjoyed reading this one again.

  5. Monte Herridge says:

    Thanks for the in-depth look at what I consider the best of the Philo Vance series. I first read this book about 25 or 30 years ago, and every so often I go back and reread it. I think it is better than the Kennel Murder Case, though I do enjoy the William Powell movie of that title. The Basil Rathbone Bishop Murder Case film didn’t seem to be as well done.

    • Hello Monte, thanks very much for the comments. I love the ultra stylish movie version of KENNEL directed by the great Michael Curtiz, while the movie version of BISHOP is very obviously an early talkie – very slow and ponderous though with some fascinating shots composed in depth. Also Rathbone seems slightly ill at ease in the role which is weird as he should have been an even better fit than William Powell in theory – still, he’d get to play the ‘Great detective’ much more successfully a decade later on. I haven’t seen that film version since a screening on TCM ages ago – it doesn’t seem to have turned up on DVD officially yet which is a real shame. You can view it online though, here:

  6. John Yeoman says:

    I had given up on Van Dine, after reading The Benson Murder Case and been appalled by Vance’s foppish hubris – Lord Peter Wimsy on steroids. But this novel has made me download every one of Van Dine’s tales. Frankly, I have never read a mystery novel so cerebral yet engaging as The Bishop Murder Case.

    • Hello John, thanks very much for the comments. Glad you liked this one too – along with THE GREENE MURDER CASE it is certainly the one that for me has stood up the best to the ravages of time (and GAD fashion).

  7. Pingback: SS Van Dine – forgotten author | Tipping My Fedora

  8. Pingback: THE DRAGON MURDER (1933) by SS Van Dine | Tipping My Fedora

  9. neer says:

    Hi Sergio

    Have never read Van Dine but your fine review makes me want to pick this up immediately. However, I am wary of the mention of incestuous relationship. B/w a parent and child, it is sickening.
    If not this one then, which other book of his would you recommend as something that will give me the thrill of discovering a new author?

    • Thanks Neeru – to be clear, this doesn’t actually happen here – its simply that there is a jealousy that implies it. if not this one, then pick up The Greene Murder Case which i think most think is the next best one 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s